| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |
Nullbeard Rager
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
23
   |
Posted - 2011.12.25 16:57:00 -
[1] - Quote
Scatim Helicon wrote:I drank nullsec koolaid and I liked it.
If the non-hardcore pvpers all cancelled their accounts I am pretty sure you would notice when tranquility went down due to lack of funds to maintain the internet and the server cluster.
If highsec isn't very relevant to nullsec it again begs the question: Why do so many nullbears want things to be "balanced" between highsec and nullsec? If nullsec is it's own little balanced world with sov the major thing to fix, why do you suppose the forums are full of nullseccers who disagree with you and want nullbear welfare to come out of carebear pockets?
Oh and those ice miner incursions by your fellow goons...
You are smoking some good $#!t.
|
Nullbeard Rager
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
23
|
Posted - 2011.12.25 17:31:00 -
[2] - Quote
Velicitia wrote:Nevryn Takis wrote:Scatim Helicon wrote:Every highsec-carebear could log off and un-install EVE tomorrow and we'd barely notice apart from the reduced lag in market systems. The things we go to empire for are seeded by NPCs (skillbooks, BPOs), imported from other 0.0 regions (minerals), or manufactured by highsec alts of 0.0 based players.
There is no 'us against them' because most of 'them' are so irrelevant to any aspect of 0.0 existance that they're barely noticeable. Goons own offensive against Gallante, and to a lesser extent Caldari, ice miners provides sufficient evidence to blow any of your arguments out of the water, otherwise the campaign would have nevr been conducted in the first place. The offensive against Gallente ice was (mainly) to pad their wallets. 1. Buy at ~500 ISK P.U. 2. run interdiction for a few months 3. let the price spike 4. sell oxytopes at 2500+ ISK P.U. 5. PROFIT I mean, sure, they said a lot of stuff about ruining it for the "empire pubbies" and whatever else ... but that's just talk. If they really wanted to ruin empire (and/or just hisec), then they'd be burning all four regions. Is it really that hard to understand?
It happened in highsec not nullsec. Is it really that hard to understand?
|
Nullbeard Rager
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
25
|
Posted - 2011.12.25 23:58:00 -
[3] - Quote
Deth Delkanara wrote:Scatim Helicon wrote:Every highsec-carebear could log off and un-install EVE tomorrow and we'd barely notice apart from the reduced lag in market systems. The things we go to empire for are seeded by NPCs (skillbooks, BPOs), imported from other 0.0 regions (minerals), or manufactured by highsec alts of 0.0 based players.
There is no 'us against them' because most of 'them' are so irrelevant to any aspect of 0.0 existance that they're barely noticeable. First, if all the Hi-sec people logged off, the market systems would not exist. First incorrect and asinine statement. If all Hi-sec didn't exist, you would not have Hi-sec alts and would be up a creek. Second asinine statement. You can buy or research all the blueprints you need in null sec? Really? I call manure and this is the third asinine and incorrect statement. And there very definitely is an "us against them" mentality as exhibited by your childish and puerile comment about how Hi-sec doesn't matter. If Hi-sec didn't matter, all you self fulfilled hull sec prima dona's would not spend any time crying about it on forums and you would not have any Hi-sec alts. In addition, all the Hi-sec people would simply ignore all things low-sec as well. The grim reality is that both are intertwined and necessary or Eve doesn't work. The majority of crying seems to occur when some crybaby (hi, low or null sec, doesn't matter) or another gets a bug in their butt that someone else is getting something that they are not and "it isn't fair." Well hell son, you are an elitist null sec space cowboy with an itchy PvP finger, butch up Sally and stop crying about fairness. Life isn't fair, you want easy, low risk ISK, you do Hi-sec stuff, you want more payout with more risk, you do null sec stuff, you want to be in the middle ground with BS aggression mechanics then do low sec. You have fun now and try not to trip, fall and skin your knee. You might get a boo boo and it might be hard to pick that ego up again.
The whole nullbear ranger/"we're cool because we pvp and you carebears suck" (in a GAME!!!) is just a sign of people wanting to feel better about themselves. Patting themselves on the back for living a life of VIRTUAL danger, where there really is ZERO risk in game regardless of which security level they play at, is just a mental crutch and always will be. Smile and pity them. (For instance when anyone uses the word "pubbie".)
Most ganking in game is done for the same reasons as in RL. Most gankers are lazy and/or enjoy making others unhappy and stealing the fruits of their labors. They play at accepting risk when what they really want is to ambush and gank which by it's very nature attempts to ELIMINATE risk and effort.
Seriously, as frustrating and annoying as they can be, when it comes right down to it, in the end it is utterly and totally meaningless and if being cool in a game gives someone a measure of virtual power and virtual dignity well, let them enjoy what happiness they can find even if it is just in a game.  |
Nullbeard Rager
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
26
|
Posted - 2011.12.26 16:38:00 -
[4] - Quote
Andski wrote:you are the biggest hypocrite imaginable, lmao
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
No.
Go ahead and check my posts and what I am responding to so you can see how silly you sound. Wishful thinking on your part does not make me, or anyone, like you.
EDIT - Even if you WERE correct it doesn't make anything I said untrue. |
Nullbeard Rager
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
26
|
Posted - 2011.12.26 16:59:00 -
[5] - Quote
Nullbeard Rager wrote:[quote=Andski]you are the biggest hypocrite imaginable, lmao
AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
No.
Go ahead and check my posts and what I am responding to so you can see how silly you sound. Wishful thinking on your part does not make me, or anyone, like you.
EDIT - Even if you WERE correct it doesn't make anything I said untrue.
|
Nullbeard Rager
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
31
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 00:08:00 -
[6] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:ban npc forum alts from CSM forums
Yes! We must ban npc forum alts...as they are NPCs and not PCs they must be bots and botting is against the EULA |
Nullbeard Rager
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
31
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 00:36:00 -
[7] - Quote
Nicolo da'Vicenza wrote:Exhibit A: ^^^
Yup just keep on spamming... |
Nullbeard Rager
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
31
|
Posted - 2011.12.28 16:02:00 -
[8] - Quote
Takara Mora wrote:Yeah less anonymity sounds great .... but would make reprisals way too easy ... then you'd only hear dominant points of view and ideas ... we'd miss out on the unexpected out of the box ideas from folks who don't belong to Goonswarm or TEST :)
Better to allow "oversharing" .... it's easy enough to ignore the posts you don't like.
Exactly.
|
Nullbeard Rager
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
45
|
Posted - 2012.01.02 18:55:00 -
[9] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:We've had more impact on EVE Online: A Bad Game, than you have. Just sayin'.
Which isn't relevant to much of anything, outside of this game. Just sayin'.
|
Nullbeard Rager
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
45
|
Posted - 2012.01.02 18:57:00 -
[10] - Quote
Selina Steel wrote:Blah. Thredd Necro wrote:
Blah, blah?
Blah.
Blah indeed. |
Nullbeard Rager
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
50
|
Posted - 2012.01.03 14:06:00 -
[11] - Quote
Lord Zim wrote:Nullbeard Rager wrote:Lord Zim wrote:We've had more impact on EVE Online: A Bad Game, than you have. Just sayin'. Which isn't relevant to much of anything, outside of this game. Just sayin'. And ultimately, we're not relevant to the universe, either. Oh well so sad.
Truth.
|
| |
|